Resigning versus being terminated
Under the old 1980 law, resigning rather than being terminated could cost you a large share of your gratuity. That reduction is gone. This page explains what replaced it, what genuinely can still be deducted, and why so many calculators still get this wrong.
The short answer
Resigning does not reduce your end-of-service gratuity. Under Federal Decree-Law No. 33 of 2021 the full entitlement is due whether you resigned or were terminated. The reason your employment ended is not an input to the amount.
Source: The UAE Government portal u.ae, whose end-of-service page sets out the entitlement without any reduction for resignation. The reduction under the repealed Federal Law No. 8 of 1980 has no counterpart in the current law.
What used to be true, and why you have probably read it
Under the 1980 labour law this worked completely differently. An employee on an unlimited contract who resigned — rather than being terminated — could lose a large share of the gratuity, scaled to how long they had served: a third for shorter service, two-thirds in the middle band, the full amount only after long service. It was a real and expensive rule, and for four decades it was the first thing anyone learned about UAE gratuity.
It was repealed. But it was repealed in a law that took effect in February 2022, and the internet has not caught up. Pages written before then were never revised; pages written since then were often assembled from pages written before then. The result is that the most widely-repeated fact about UAE gratuity is a rule that no longer exists.
The practical test: if a calculator asks whether you resigned and then reduces your figure, or asks whether your contract is limited or unlimited, it is running the old law. What the law actually says goes through the change in full.
Why this calculator asks anyway
The calculator on this site does ask why your employment ended, even though the answer does not change the amount. That is deliberate.
People arrive at this question expecting it to matter, because for decades it did and because most of what they will have read says it still does. A tool that simply declines to ask leaves that belief intact — the reader assumes the calculator forgot, and trusts the number less. A tool that asks and then says plainly “this did not change your figure, and here is why” answers the question the reader actually came with.
What can still legitimately reduce your settlement
“The reason does not reduce the gratuity” is not the same as “nothing can come off”. Two things genuinely can.
- Amounts you owe the employer. The law permits deduction of sums the worker genuinely owes — an outstanding staff loan, a salary advance, a documented debt. This is about real obligations, not about the manner of leaving. If something is being deducted, the right question is which debt it corresponds to and what evidences it.
- Notice you did not serve. If you leave without giving the notice your contract requires, the employer may be entitled to compensation in lieu for the unserved part. That is a separate liability that may be set against what you are paid — it is not a reduction of the gratuity itself. How notice works.
Dismissal for cause
Summary dismissal — where an employer terminates without notice for one of the grounds the law specifically lists — is the case people ask about next, and it is worth separating two questions that get merged.
The first is whether the dismissal was lawful, which is a matter of whether the conduct fell within the listed grounds and whether the required process was followed. The second is what is owed on exit. Under the current law the end-of-service gratuity is not framed as forfeitable for misconduct in the way the old law’s scheme allowed; the consequence of a lawful summary dismissal falls on notice and on any compensation, rather than on the accrued entitlement.
If you are in that situation, this is the point at which a calculator stops being the right tool. MOHRE handles employment disputes, and a dismissal you believe was unjustified is a complaint to make there rather than an arithmetic problem to solve here.
What to do with a settlement you disagree with
Run the calculator, then compare it to the settlement line by line rather than total by total. Because this site shows every step — your daily wage, which band applied, what was multiplied by what — you can identify the exact step where your employer’s arithmetic and this one diverge.
Most disagreements resolve at one of three steps: the basic figure used (see what counts as basic salary), the last day used (see notice periods), or a deduction with no stated basis. Naming the step is a far stronger position than disputing a total.